Prices and model names in this article were updated on 31 October 2026.

Local LLMs get pitched as free inference once you own the hardware. That is true per token and misleading per month. You still pay for the card, the electricity and your own time. You also pay for the quality gap between what fits on a desk and what runs in a data centre.

The answer for October 2026 depends almost entirely on which cloud price you compare against. One RTX 5090 running all day costs about $4.36 a day. It breaks even with Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol at about 0.84M tokens a day. Against GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5 or a hosted open model, the same card needs 13 to 24 million tokens a day. That is roughly 150 to 280 tokens per second, around the clock.

The hardware baseline

Memory decides which models you can run locally. The Ollama README asks for "at least 8 GB of RAM available to run the 7B models", 16 GB for the 13B models and 32 GB for the 33B models. The table lists the options we could price from a source page.

Option Memory Price Source
NVIDIA RTX 5090 (buy) 32 GB $1,999 launch price (January 2025); 575 W board power PC Gamer
Mac Studio, M5 Max (buy) up to 128 GB unified from $2,499 MacRumors
Mac Studio, M5 Ultra (buy) up to 512 GB unified from $5,499; a MacRumors headline gives $22,299 for the 512 GB build MacRumors
RTX 3090 (rent) 24 GB $0.50 per hour Runpod
RTX 4090 (rent) 24 GB $0.89 per hour Runpod
RTX 5090 (rent) 32 GB $1.19 per hour Runpod
A100 PCIe (rent) 80 GB $1.79 per hour Runpod
H100 PCIe (rent) 80 GB $2.89 per hour Runpod

The RTX 5090 figure is NVIDIA's launch price. Street prices in late 2026 can differ, so check before you buy. The Runpod rates come from its page dated 8 October 2026.

What fits on which box, from the sources in this article:

Model Memory it needs Source
Llama 3.1 8B 4.7 GB download at 4-bit Ollama README
Gemma 4 E4B "needs 12–16 GB" DataNorth
gpt-oss-20b "fits into 16 GB of memory" AWS Bedrock model card
Qwen3.8-27B, Gemma 4 31B 27B and 31B dense, so the 32 GB tier by the Ollama rule Ollama README
gpt-oss-120b one 80 GB GPU TestingCatalog

The reference case below is a single RTX 5090. It holds everything up to the 27–31B dense models, and it led NVIDIA's RTX 50 series at launch.

The cost math

Cloud baseline at 500K tokens a day

Take a moderate workload: 500K tokens a day, 300K input and 200K output. On GPT-6 Luna ($0.10 input, $0.50 output per million tokens):

On GPT-6.1 Sol ($2 / $10):

When this article first ran, the reference models were Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80 / $4) and GPT-4o ($2.50 / $10). The cheap end of the market has fallen furthest since then, and that is what moves the break-even. The price history has the full curve.

Cloud model $/1M in / out 500K tokens a day Per year Source
GPT-6 Astra $10 / $50 $13.00 $4,745 OpenAI
Claude Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 $5.20 $1,898 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Sonnet 5.5 $2 / $10 $2.60 $949 OpenAI, Anthropic
Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.75 / $3.75 $0.98 $356 Google
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (peak hours) $0.30 / $1.20 $0.33 $120 DeepSeek
gpt-oss-120B on Groq $0.15 / $0.60 $0.17 $60 Groq
GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.10 / $0.50 $0.13 $47 OpenAI, Anthropic
Llama 3.3 70B on OpenRouter $0.10 / $0.32 $0.09 $34 OpenRouter
Llama 3.1 8B on Cloudflare (fp8-fast) $0.045 / $0.384 $0.09 $33 Cloudflare

Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 / $0.50 for prompts up to 100K tokens and $0.50 / $2.50 above that. Gemini 3.8 Flash rises to $1.50 / $7.50 on 1 January 2027. The October 2026 pricing snapshot lists every model with a source link per row.

Local baseline with one RTX 5090

This is a deliberately simple bound. It counts the card at full board power all day and leaves out the rest of the machine. A card that idles half the day draws less. Replace 18.34 cents with your own tariff.

Break-even

Daily cloud cost grows with tokens. Local cost is roughly fixed. Break-even volume is the local daily cost divided by the cloud price per token. Assume a 60/40 input/output split. GPT-6 Luna's blended price is then 0.6 × $0.10 + 0.4 × $0.50 = $0.26 per million tokens. So $4.36 ÷ $0.26 = 16.8M tokens a day.

Tokens per day one owned RTX 5090 must process to cost less than each cloud model Break-even for one RTX 5090 ($4.36 a day), tokens per day Closed model API Hosted open weights GPT-6 Astra 0.17M · 2 tok/s Claude Opus 5.5 0.42M · 5 tok/s GPT-6.1 Sol / Sonnet 5.5 0.84M · 10 tok/s Gemini 3.8 Flash 2.2M · 26 tok/s DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (peak) 6.6M · 76 tok/s gpt-oss-120B (Groq) 13.2M · 153 tok/s GPT-6 Luna / Haiku 5.5 16.8M · 194 tok/s Llama 3.3 70B (OpenRouter) 23.2M · 268 tok/s Llama 3.1 8B (Cloudflare) 24.1M · 279 tok/s 60% input, 40% output. tok/s = tokens per day ÷ 86,400, i.e. sustained all day. Card $1,999 over 3 years + 575 W for 24 h at 18.34 ¢/kWh. Prices read 30 Oct 2026.
How many tokens a day one owned RTX 5090 must process before it costs less than each cloud option.

The chart splits into two groups.

Against frontier models, the card pays for itself at modest volume. It breaks even with Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol at 0.84M tokens a day. That holds only if the local model does the job as well. The next section shows it usually does not.

Against cheap closed models and hosted open weights, the card needs 13 to 24 million tokens a day. That is 150 to 280 tokens per second, every second. Llama 3.1 8B on Cloudflare is the fairest comparison. It runs the same weights on someone else's GPU and costs $0.09 a day for the reference workload. Sustained throughput on one card depends on the model, the quantisation and how many requests you batch together. We found no published benchmark that met our sourcing rule, so measure it on your own box before you buy.

Renting changes the math again. An RTX 5090 on Runpod at $1.19 an hour costs $28.56 a day. Against GPT-6 Luna that needs 110M tokens a day, about 1,270 tokens per second. Rented GPUs pay off for bursty batch jobs or for models no API sells. They rarely beat an API that already hosts the same model.

Scaling up to 5M tokens a day

At 5M tokens a day (3M input, 2M output), a medium-traffic production system:

Option Daily cost Annual cost
GPT-6 Astra $130.00 $47,450
Claude Opus 5.5 $52.00 $18,980
GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Sonnet 5.5 $26.00 $9,490
Gemini 3.8 Flash $9.75 $3,559
One RTX 5090, owned (any model that fits) $4.36 $1,590
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (peak hours) $3.30 $1,205
gpt-oss-120B on Groq $1.65 $602
GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5 $1.30 $475
Llama 3.1 8B on Cloudflare (fp8-fast) $0.90 $330
Annual cost at 5M tokens a day: cloud models versus one owned RTX 5090 Annual cost at 5M tokens a day Cloud Local GPU Llama 3.1 8B (Cloudflare) $330 GPT-6 Luna / Haiku 5.5 $475 gpt-oss-120B (Groq) $602 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (peak) $1,205 One RTX 5090, owned $1,590 Gemini 3.8 Flash $3,559 GPT-6.1 Sol / Sonnet 5.5 $9,490 Claude Opus 5.5 $18,980 GPT-6 Astra ($47,450) is off the scale. 3M input + 2M output tokens a day, standard prices. Local: card over 3 years plus electricity at full power; your time not included.
A year at 5M tokens a day: one owned GPU sits between the cheap tier and the mid-tier models.

At this volume one owned GPU costs less than Gemini 3.8 Flash and the frontier models. It costs more than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5 and hosted open weights. All cloud figures above are standard prices. Batch APIs at OpenAI, Anthropic and Google take another 50% off work that can wait up to 24 hours, which widens the gap. The costs at scale article covers what else changes at high volume.

The quality gap

Cheap local inference is only cheap if the local model does the job. The Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (v4.3.2, read 17 October 2026, as reported by DevelopersDigest) is one aggregate view. Parameter counts come from press coverage (eesel for MiMo, Forkast for Kimi K3, DataCamp for DeepSeek).

Model Index Weights Runs on one 32 GB card?
Claude Opus 5.5 58 closed no (API only)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 56 closed no (API only)
GPT-6.1 Sol 52 closed no (API only)
MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) 46 open, MIT no: 1.02T parameters in total
Kimi K3 (Moonshot) 44 open, modified MIT no: 2.8T-parameter MoE
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 39 open, MIT no: 284B parameters in total (V4 Flash)
Qwen3.8-27B (Alibaba) 34 open, Apache 2.0 yes, at the edge

The open models that come closest to the frontier are far too large for a desk. The best one on this list that fits on a single card scores 34 against 56–58 at the top. An index is an average over many tasks, so it says little about your one task. It does tell you the gap is real.

Tasks where small and mid-sized local models often hold up:

Tasks where you will see the gap:

The small language models guide has a 200-example protocol for testing whether a small model is good enough on your traffic.

The tooling stack

Ollama is the easiest entry point. It downloads models from a registry and serves an OpenAI-compatible API at http://localhost:11434/v1/, including /v1/chat/completions, /v1/embeddings and /v1/models.

# Install Ollama from ollama.com, then:
ollama pull gpt-oss:20b     # needs about 16 GB
ollama pull llama3.1:8b     # 4.7 GB at 4-bit

# Call it like any OpenAI-compatible endpoint:
curl http://localhost:11434/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "gpt-oss:20b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this: ..."}]
  }'

llama.cpp gives lower-level control over quantisation and over how a model's layers split between GPU and CPU. That matters when a model is slightly too big for your VRAM.

vLLM is the usual choice for serving a team or a product. It schedules requests with continuous batching and stores the attention cache in small pages (PagedAttention), so one GPU serves many requests at once. It also exposes an OpenAI-compatible server. Throughput, the number the break-even chart depends on, comes from this batching. The talk below covers it.

Simon Mo, a vLLM co-lead, at PyTorch Conference 2025 on throughput and cost of self-hosted serving.

Decision matrix

Situation Recommendation
A cheap API model (GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5) passes your evals Cloud. One owned card needs about 17M tokens a day to win.
Only a frontier model passes, and no local model does Cloud, with caching and batch discounts.
A local model passes evals that only a frontier API passed before Local pays off above about 0.84M tokens a day against Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol.
Volume is low or spiky Cloud. An idle card still costs $1.83 a day in depreciation.
Data must not leave your network Local, whatever the cost.
No one on the team can run it Cloud. See the next section.

The hybrid playbook covers the middle case: a local model for the easy share of traffic and a cloud model for the rest.

The operational overhead

Someone has to run the box. Models and drivers need updates, jobs run out of memory, and fans fail. Each problem is small, but together they take hours.

Put those hours into the same daily figure. Every hour a month you spend on the server adds a thirtieth of your hourly cost to each day. One owned RTX 5090 costs $4.36 a day, or $131 over 30 days. Suppose an hour of your time is worth more than $131. Then one hour a month of upkeep costs more than the card and the electricity together.

For teams with dedicated ML infrastructure, local inference is worth building. For a small team where AI is one feature among many, the upkeep often outweighs the savings until volume is high.

What to do next

Log a week of real traffic and count tokens per day, split into input and output. Divide your local daily cost by each candidate model's blended price to get your own break-even. If you are near it, rent the card for a day and measure sustained tokens per second before buying. If you want a second pair of eyes on the numbers, we run these comparisons at Divero.

Sources